June 28, 2004:   One Nation. Err...Kind of. 
Previous Entry: Farewell to Florida | Next Entry: Iraq, a Wedding, a Birthday, Some planning...  

Shot O' the Week
...reflections of a truly blogged life.

Shot O' the Week!

Places to Go, People to See
...Jump around! Jump around!

Custom LEGO mosaics
Polibus.com
JeffPollard.net
Olivia's World
House of Klause


This Site Brought to You By:
...rich, chocolatey Ovaltine and:

The letter "B."
My host, Jeff Pollard.

 

It was nice being on vacation in Florida. I came home to news that looked like this, and frankly, wished I had stayed as unplugged from the world as I was in Florida.

Just for posterity's sake (for the archives here) I'd like to list what's going on in the world. In less than two days, the people of Iraq will be following a new government, one setup by the coalition forces and (most importantly) its own people. Much like the Afghani regime change, there will be resistance. There have been many outlashings of dissatisfaction (to say the least) among terrorist groups about this. And now, they've resorted to kill innocents to stop the inevitable takeover of their old system of government.

It's a scary thing to think about hostages being taken. I realize that there is money to be made in the restoration of a torn country, and that hazard pay can help families around the country, but at the same time, I can't understand why men with families would go half-way around the world to put themselves in a position where their necks would be slit for no reason. No nation is going to surrender itself to save the life of one person. The hostage-takers demands have been that we withdrawal our troops. That's not going to happen. I really really really hope that doesn't happen.

For one thing, I don't yet think that Iraq is stable. All evidence points to violence- and not just the local hardware store getting knocked over kind of violence, either. We're talking car bombs folks. Throats being cut. Heads coming off. These are people not passionate, but fanatical about hatred. I don't think any group out there in the middle east right now (our own troops included) have a handle on the violence yet. It scares me to think that we're going to hand over the keys to a city that's still in some severe turmoil to a new government.

It has started to bug me more recently how incredibly anti-government CNN is. In fact, just about every news portal has been jumping onto the "sensational" stories of the unsensational just to provoke some fear. What's important to focus on is that there are countries in chaos, our men and women are out there (with other supporting nations) trying to get a handle on stability for them, and we as a nation need to stand behind the cause of fixing what has been (through war, time, and changes of government) a very long and destructive life for many of these people.

When I think of assholes like Michael Moore launching a film in a time like this, it makes my blood boil. The man has a personal grudge. Oh, and how convienant it is that he has a wallet big enough to fund this mockery of a film with poisoning and slanted views of how things have really gone down in years of late.

It's gotten a rise out of me, which I suppose was the point.

While I watched Moore's film last night on my computer, I just got more and more ill with the lies. It bothers me that this film is being passed off as a documentary. This is on man's agenda on film. Frankly, I've seen better film on teeth. I'm proud to say that I didn't pay a penny for watching this flick, and mainly watched to fuel my own fire for loathing the man.

And loathe him I do.

Jesus Christ. With the entire liberal press (TV, web, print, radio) and terds like Moore out there, I wonder where the voices of reason are. I find that I'm having to defend the president.

Let me say that again. I find that I'm having to defend the president. It shouldn't be this way, folks. We're a nation (albeit a bipartisan one) with a leader who made several tough decisions in the interest of peace in the world- something that we've all hoped for but never really done much about. And I have to sit here and try and think of ways to justify why this is a good thing? C'mon.

Maybe this is what the diehard democrats felt like when Clinton was busted for lying about cheating on his wife. It's unsettling to me. I mean, the last time I felt this cheated by the nation's reaction to current events was when OJ was found not guilty. I can't even think about CNN without getting pissed. So you know what? Screw 'em. I've got a venue here for griping.

And so do you.

Anyone remember the good ol' days? Sheesh.



Comments:

The good ol' days when people posted comments on all our respective sites? Yeah, I remember those days. Seems like a long time ago.....


Posted by Chris R. at June 28, 2004 10:50 AM

I saw 9/11 last night too, I don't think I wasted $9 or 2 hours of my time by seeying it though. "White Chicks" was the number two movie this weekend... Society has lost it's finesse Brian.


Posted by Tiago at June 28, 2004 11:10 AM

VOTE NADER!!!

I met a Russian journalist once who said that CNN was more guilty of censorship and manipulating public opinion than the Kremlin ever was...

BTW - you're cute and all but can we get the shot of Heidi I sent you up there as the Shot O' the Week? Hook your brothers up son!


Posted by Mackey at June 28, 2004 11:35 AM

Wow. It's pretty nice to hear your side of the issue, B...Especially since most of the people I circle with are all for Moore's work. One thing I can say for sure is that we all truly do have our own agendas; Moore simply has the resorces to support his. Being that I from a journalism backgroung, I've had to learn to understand that there really is no such thing as objective journalism, especially documentary journalism. Moore's work is a good example of this.

However, to stick my neck out a bit, there are a lot of people out there, in our country and others, who lack the political freedom, technology and/or monetary resourses to support their opinions and represent their ideas. Sometimes we can take seemingly drastic measures when this is the case? Not that I condone violence, by any means, it's just one way of understanding.

Thanks for getting my wheels turning! :)


Posted by Courtney at June 28, 2004 11:50 AM

In an interview with Spike Lee about Moore's flick, he reminded the interviewer that a filmmaker's objectives are to get people talking and start a dialogue, so I guess it wouldn't offend Moore that the movie pissed me off. It got me blogging about it. So, if that was his mission, it worked.

(but I don't think his mission was to start a dialogue. He's been quoted many times saying that he made this movie to get Bush out of the white house).

Thoughts?


Posted by Brian at June 28, 2004 01:09 PM

Well, I don't really know if I can speak on just what Moore's mission is...I just don't know him well enough. :)

But what I will say is that I think making decisions as to who we will be voting for, or not voting for fo that matter, can only be influenced JUST SO MUCH by what we watch on tv, read in the paper, see on film, etc. I would have to say that most of these decisions are based on other personal resons that are MORE influenced by socio-economic factors like class, race, gender, education, etc.

So, if more is trying to provide legitmate political sway, I don't buy that it will be all that successful.


Posted by Court at June 28, 2004 02:54 PM

Brian, I actually think that one of the great things about this country is the freedom for people like Michael Moore to express themselves in ways like filmmaking. Isn't that one of the reasons this country has fought past wars--to preserve freedoms like Moore's right to make movies that are controversial?

My personal feeling is that this country needs more controversy, not less of it. How can it be a bad thing that people are talking about politics and expressing views? Many Republicans who disagree with Moore would have him merely shut up and go away. I partially agree with that sentiment, cause he's an annoying, arrogant prick. But this country is better off, if we are a true democracy, to have an educated populace rather than one with it's collective head in the sand.

While I in no way subscribe to Moore's political ideology, nor would I partake in President-bashing when he needs all the support he can get right now, I do defend Moore's right to express himself and try to use the wonderfully persuasive medium of film to sway public opinion (and also to exercise my right to write run-on sentences.) If anyone doubts the power of film to do so, just remember the days of subliminal advertising in the movies. ("Let's go out to the lobby, let's go out to the lobby, let's go out to the lobby and get ourselves a snack...")

I agree with you, Brian, that Moore does have an agenda of his own. Although I haven't seen it yet, his agenda most certainly must come out in the film, but why is that a bad thing? Just remember that ultimately, it's about him trying to make a buck and entertain people. For that, it has served its purpose. Whether he is successful or not in removing Bush from office, I guess we'll find out in November upon analysis of the exit polls.

Excellent post today, way to get everyone's juices flowing...

-Big D


Posted by Dan at June 28, 2004 04:38 PM

The part two of this blog was going to be about that very thing, Dan. You took the wind out of my sails, but you know, it bears repeating.

While I think he's an assclown, I am very very grateful that we live in a nation where assclowns like Moore have the right to speak his mind. I am also glad that I have the right to call him an assclown. God bless America.

When the power of this form of government is discovered by people previously under the rule of Sadaam and his sons, I think it'll be a little crazy, to say the least. It will be interesting to watch how things develop. Hopefully they'll struggle peacefully instead of violently. Resistance to change can be quite a bitch.


Posted by Brian at June 28, 2004 06:15 PM

God Bless America.


Posted by Assclown at June 28, 2004 07:35 PM

...and hopefully, in an effort to not discriminate based on social-polical borders, a couple other countries too.


Posted by Tiago at June 28, 2004 08:26 PM

most definitely!


Posted by Brian at June 28, 2004 10:26 PM

Oh my gosh....a political blog?! I have to tell Mike about this! :)


Posted by Lauren at June 29, 2004 06:16 AM

My ranting on the current state of our nation and it's governing system would take up way too much space.
I do agree with some other folks that wrote in and stated that at least this film has us talking. Let's keep talking. While we talk I want us to keep something in mind...we are allowed to talk about it. A majority of countries on this planet do not give their citizens the right to voice an opinion, either pro or con, on the current state of government. When our founding fathers wrote our constitution they made sure we sould be allowed to do so. There's also a provision in there that states, in simple terms, that if the people don't like the way our government works, change it, scrap it and start over.
I often think of something my father once told me, a man who has seen more political unrest and war than any of us can even fathom, he said, "Sweetie, I see more atrocities before lunch than most people will ever even hear about in a lifetime. War is hell. When you talk to God tonight, thank him for your birth in this country." I do. I also thank God for men, and women, like my father.
And one last thing, while I don't relish the process of, yet again, choosing the lesser of two evils this fall, I again thank God that I have that right.
God Bless America, we shall overcome.


Posted by Rebecca at June 30, 2004 11:48 AM

Rebecca- I'm curious what your father does for a living? "more atrocities before lunch than most people will every even hear about in a lifetime..." wow.


Posted by Dan at June 30, 2004 05:11 PM

Hello. I just wanted to encourage all of you to try democracynow.org...it's an independant news and information site and radio program. It may come across as "liberal press" but just check out the information on what they are about first. Having researched the organization, I feel most comfortable getting my information from them. Try it and see what you think.


Posted by Courtney at July 1, 2004 11:13 AM

My greatest strength as a consultant is to be ignorant and ask a few questions.


Posted by Michael O'Brien at July 5, 2004 05:57 AM



Previous Entry: Farewell to Florida | Next Entry: Iraq, a Wedding, a Birthday, Some planning...